Why A Facilitator Of Change? by Dean Gotcher

Why A Facilitator Of 'Change?'
'Change' does not happen naturally.

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

While a child might not like (and more than likely hates) being told he can not do what he wants to do, with the understanding he will be punished if he disobeys, when he grows up and has children of his own he naturally tells his children what they can and can not do, punishing them if they disobey. It is therefore essential for a facilitator of 'change' to "help" him overcome his naturally tendency as an adult, i.e., as a parent of telling his children what they can and can not do, punishing them if they disobey, so he can do what is natural to a child, loving pleasure and hating restraint, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, hating being told what he can and can not do, with the understanding that he will be punished (held accountable) if he disobeys. While 'change' is natural for a child, going from one toy to another, chasing after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, when he grows up and becomes mature, knowing right from wrong from being told, 'change' becomes more difficult—as he wants to do what is right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., recognizing and accepting the fact that he is responsible, i.e., accountable for his thoughts and actions to a higher authority than his own carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, naturally requiring his children to do the same, i.e., to do what he did not want to do as a child, i.e., to willingly humble, deny, die to, control, disciple their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, doing so without questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking his authority when it gets in the way of their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates.

Karl Marx (and those following after him) explained it this way:

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb.

"The dialectical method [dialogue] was overthrown—the parts [the children] were prevented from finding their definition within the whole [through the use of dialogue 'discovering' their commonality with one another, i.e., their love of pleasure (right) and hate of restraint (being told they are wrong)]." "... for the dialectical method the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws' [where the father's/Father's authority (do right and not wrong) rules over the child's carnal nature (which is always right in the child's eyes)]." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our "self interest" in others, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common with one another, i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once the father's/Father's authority is no longer in their way. The problem, according to Marx, et al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do, getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, i.e., preventing them from being their "self," i.e., preventing 'change.' It is therefore essential, if 'change' is to become the way of life, that parents dialogue with their children, i.e., get in touch with their "feelings," i.e., their carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—instead of telling them what is right and wrong, punishing them when they disobey.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world, i.e., his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates)—becoming of (and now for) "self" and the world only instead]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

By making pleasure, i.e., the child's carnal nature, instead of doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth the objective of life, the father's/Father's authority system, that prevents 'change' is easily replaced with the child's carnal nature that is easily subject to 'change.'

"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3)

Without the negation of the father's/Father's authority (parental authority) in the children's thoughts, 'change' can not become a reality in society. Under traditional Marxism (traditional Communism) if the father refused to dialogue with the children (refused to negate his authority), i.e., refused to become "equal" with them (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue), insisting upon his way, i.e., holding to his authority instead, he got shot. The problem was the children grew up restoring the father's/Father's authority in their thoughts and actions. Without restructuring the classroom, i.e. the children's education, the father's/Father's authority would continue to reappear. Therefore dialogue ("feelings") in the classroom (and in all policy making environments) had to replace the preaching, teaching, and discussing of commands, rules, facts, and truth, in order to be right and not wrong according to them, if continuous 'change' was to become reality.

"The child [and adult] takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)

The "educator," i.e., facilitator of 'change' does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parents authority when they get home from school (if the students are not doing that already), all the "educator," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' has to do is "encourage" (under "group" pressure, i.e., the students natural desire for "group" approval and fear of "group" rejection) the students to dialogue their opinions (their "feelings" regarding personal-social issues) to a consensus (to a "feeling" of "oneness") in the classroom, affirming their carnal nature, i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and their hating restraint, i.e., hating being told what they can and can not do, being punished when they disobey and the students will naturally question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parents authority when the get home from school, being 'justified' in their "self," i.e., in their love of ("lusting" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates over and therefore against their parents authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth.

"Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students [those who do the father's/Father's will, i.e., who know from being told] that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)

While the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates is natural to the child, so is the father's/Father's authority, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. What I mean by this is the child can know right from wrong from being told, as well as from experiencing it for his "self." By making "experiencing it" for his "self" the pathway to knowing, the soul of the child, i.e., knowing from being told (which is only found in man, i.e., not in anything else in the creation—therefore can not be evolved), is negated, resulting the carnal nature of the child (and anyone manipulating it) being in control of the child's thoughts and actions from then on. Without the "help" of the facilitator of 'change,' the child can not be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from wanting to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., from that which is also natural to man.

"Once the earthly family [with children having to humble and deny their "self" in order to do their father's will] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son, Jesus Christ, and all following Him having to humble and deny their "self" in order to do His Heavenly Father's will], the former [the earthly father's authority system, with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents)] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [negated in the children's personal thoughts and social actions—resulting in their no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their common carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment']." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"prevent[ing] someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space." (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future)

As Lenin explained: Marxism, i.e., facilitation of 'change' is all about negating the father's/Father's authority in the thoughts and actions of the children, so the facilitator of 'change' could live life without having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—doing that which is natural to man, i.e., "lusting" after the pleasures of the world, without doing that which is natural to man, i.e., the father's authority, i.e., knowing right from wrong from being told—living life according to Immanuel Kant's dictum instead, a life of "lawfulness without law" where the child's carnal nature rules without the father's/Father's restraints.

A "more powerful enemy, the bourgeoisie [the middle class-traditional family, with the father's authority over the family, a top-down system of government], whose resistance … and whose power lies ... in the force of habit, in the strength of small-scale production." "Unfortunately, small-scale production is still widespread in the world, and small-scale production engenders capitalism and the bourgeoisie continuously, daily, hourly, spontaneously, and on a mass scale." "... the peasantry constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "... gigantic problems of re-educating ..." "... eradicating their bourgeois habits and traditions...." "... until small-scale economy and small commodity production have entirely disappeared, the bourgeois atmosphere, proprietary habits and petty-bourgeois traditions will hamper proletarian work both outside and within the working-class movement, …" "... in every field of social activity, in all cultural and political spheres without exception." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs and traditions everywhere." "... capitalism and the bourgeois environment … disappears very slowly even after the overthrow of the bourgeoisie, since the peasantry constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie give rise to what is essentially the same bourgeois careerism, national chauvinism, petty-bourgeois vulgarity, etc. —merely varying insignificantly in form—in positively every sphere of activity and life." Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920

Without the "help" of facilitates of 'change,' doing what the master facilitator of 'change' did in the garden in Eden—"helping" two "children" 'liberate' their "self" from the "Father's" authority—children will grow up doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., not being able to "think" for their "self," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, hating restraint, i.e., hating the Father's authority—being therefore able to do wrong, disobey, sin without having a guilty conscience. Facilitator's of 'change' praxis Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., the 'justification' of "self" in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the Father's authority in order to negate Romans 7:14-25, the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning (needing a savior). 'Creating' a new world order—'created' in the image of the facilitator of 'change—with the facilitator of 'change' ruling over the children, using them (as "human resource") for his own carnal pleasure and gain, i.e., buying and selling their soul as merchandise (doing so without having a guilty conscience) is the agenda (purpose) of those facilitating 'change.'

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making [based on right-wrong thinking, i.e.., "I am right and you are wrong," i.e., engendering majority vote or leadership decision], our objective centers upon transforming public opinion [right only, where all are right—except those who believe they are right and others are wrong] into an effective instrument of global politics [where everyone must participate]." [In a discussion you are right and the other person is wrong, with you trying to persuade them that they are wrong and you are right, only facts and truth persuading you that you are wrong and they are right, while in a dialogue all are right, i.e., everyone is entitled to their opinion—with anyone accusing others of being wrong being guilty of getting in the way of dialogue, i.e., of opinions, i.e., of "self interests," therefore being wrong, i.e., hateful, i.e., prejudiced, etc.,.] "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common[ist] interests and ultimately to world[ly] interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world[ly] order." "Consensus [abdicating right-wrong thinking, 'justifying' wrong thinking] is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the student's "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., their love pleasures and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the child's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation," since the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience which it engenders, is negative to the child's carnal nature), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human-ist resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" can do wrong, disobey, sin with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal desires) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12